Legal Opinion
Year 2001 Budget Appeal of Landgren v. Pipestone County Board of Commissioners
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 25, 2001No. CX-01-618PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge
The county sheriff challenged a resolution by the county board, contending that the funding for the sheriffs budget was inadequate. He personally served notice of appeal on the county auditor pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 387.20, subd. 7 (2000). The district court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that, under Minn. R. Civ. P. 4.02, a party to the action may not serve the summons. Because the district court correctly interpreted the rule, we affirm.
FACTS
On December 26, 2000, respondent Pipe-stone County Board of Commissioners passed its annual…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tullis v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Amdahl v. Stonewall Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Leek v. American Express Property CasualtyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Winkel v. Eden Rehabilitation Treatment Facility, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Lewis v. Contracting Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Skyline Materials, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Shawn Drewicke v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025