Helmer v. Rehm
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Pound, J. The action was one of attachment, and the error complained of was in the overruling of a motion by plaintiff to confirm the sale of real property attached.
1Opinion of the Court
Lake, Ch. J.
I can discover in this record but a single ground on which the refusal' of the court to confirm the sale can be sustained, and that is the error in the description of the land found in the published notice given by the sheriff; and this is not one of the grounds of objection urged by counsel against the sale.
The land attached and ordered sold by the judgment was the north half of the south-east quarter of section thirty, in township twelve north, range five east; and this is the tract which the sheriff returned as sold under a no*220tice given on the 9th of April, of a sale to take…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Savidge v. SeagerMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. HughesNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
- Franse v. ArmbusterNebraska Supreme Court · 1890