Legal Opinion

State v. House

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 9, 1984No. 82-0265 CA A 25766PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

In State v. House, 66 Or App 953, 676 P2d 892 (1984), we reversed defendant’s conviction for engaging in “sexual conduct” in a “live public show.” ORS 167.062(1). We held that ORS 167.062(1) is overbroad, that on its face it violates Article 1, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution, and that defendant’s demurrer to the indictment should have been sustained.

ORS 167.062 (1) provides:

“It is unlawful for any person to knowingly engage in sadomasochistic abuse or sexual conduct in a live public show.

“Sadomasochistic abuse” and “sexual conduct” are defined in separate definitional sections:

“…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. CantwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. State v. HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. GatewoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. State v. HouseOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Sekne v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Korgan v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. State v. HouseOregon Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API