Legal Opinion
Sekne v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 15, 1986No. A8504-02530; CA A36443PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action to obtain a declaration that two Portland City Code (PCC) ordinances prohibiting nudity in taverns and restaurants, PCC 14.36.010 and PCC 14.36.020, could not validly be enforced against them. In their complaint, plaintiffs alleged that the ordinances have been preempted by the Oregon Liquor Control Act, see ORS 471.045, and that they violate Article I, section 39, of the Oregon Constitution and the right to free expression guaranteed by Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution and the First Amendment. The parties stipulated to the relevant facts, and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Schad v. Borough of Mount EphraimSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jenkins v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Goldrush II v. City of MariettaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Knudtson v. City of CoatesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- City of Nyssa v. DuflothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- W.D.C., Inc. v. City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
- City of Nyssa v. DuflothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.