Legal Opinion
State v. Cantwell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 8, 1984No. B64-751, B64-713; CA A28712PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.
The court sustained defendants’ demurrers to complaints charging them with disorderly conduct, ORS 166.025 (1)(a), on the ground that under Article 1, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution the underlying statute is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad in its entirety. The state appeals. We reverse and remand.
At the time ORS 166.025 (since amended by Or Laws 1983, ch 546, §5), provided:
“(1) A person commits the crime of disorderly conduct if, with intent to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he:
“(a) Engages in fighting or in violent,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. MarkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Michael Day v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. AlbarelliSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- City of Eugene v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.