Legal Opinion

McCray v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 24, 1985No. 31, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUCH, Judge.

We granted certiorari in this case to consider whether the trial court erred in refusing to allow a proffered defense witness to testify in his behalf on the basis of a violation of the sequestration rule1 when there was no request for sequestration nor any such order. Under the facts and circumstances present we hold the trial judge did err.

Ernest McCray was charged with, inter alia, second degree rape and child abuse. He was tried in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and convicted of these two charges. Upon appeal to the Court of Special Appeals that court affirmed the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Robeson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Walston v. Sun Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Snowhite v. State, Use of TennantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. State v. HeppleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Maus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. State v. EarpCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Devincentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  5. Hopkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API