Ex Parte Urquhart
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice FITZGERALD.
Russell Urquhart was convicted of driving while intoxicated. The conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. See Urquhart v. State, 128 S.W.3d 701 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2003, pet. ref'd). Appellant later filed an application for writ of habeas corpus asserting he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. See Tex.Code CRiM. Proc. Ann. art. 11.072 (Vernon 2005). Following a hearing, the trial court denied appellant the relief he sought. In his sole issue, appellant asserts the trial court erred in denying him relief. We affirm the trial court’s order.
Back…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Erdman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Parte Klem, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2008
- Ex Parte Patricia Foster Skelton, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
- Ex Parte Jeffrey Allan Klem, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2008
- Ex Parte Johnnie Lewis O'Neal, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2015
- Ex Parte Jose Cuenca Motta, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.