Legal Opinion

Price v. Cox

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1942No. 6 Div. 985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

Appellee, D. E. Cox, brought suit in assumpsit against “Paul Wilson and George Price, partners doing business as The Villa Venice.”

Mr. Wilson made no defense to the suit.

Mr. Price filed a sworn plea denying the existence of a partnership as alleged.

The cause was tried on this issue, resulting in a verdict and judgment against both defendants. Mr. Price appeals.

Appellant earnestly insists the evidence was insufficient to meet the burden of proof cast upon the plaintiff by the sworn plea denying the existence of a partnership between Wilson and Price, and that appellant was due…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fred Gray Cotton & Gin Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Weil Bros. v. HanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Odess v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. Reserve Nat. Ins. Co. v. CrowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Bailey v. BaileyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  4. Murphy v. PickleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Crosswhite v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API