Legal Opinion
Abrahams v. Universal Wire Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 10, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
The plaintiff sues to restrain an alleged infringement of patent No. 1,501,032, issued by the United States Patent Office to Max Abrahams, for acoustic horn, dated July 15, 1924. The defendant answered interposing the defenses of invalidity and noninfringement.
The patent relates to an acoustic horn composed of a textile fabric with a pile surface which is impregnated with a water soluble paste of which glue and dextrine are cited as examples. The type of underwear known as fleece-lined is mentioned as a preferred fabric, but the patent is not limited to it; on the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Boyce v. Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chandler v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1940
- Claude Neon Electrical Products, Inc. v. Brilliant Tube Sign Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1930
- Angle v. RichardsonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937