Still v. State
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WEATHERBEE, Justice.
Petitioner’s appeal from the denial of the Writ of Habeas Corpus raises the single question of whether a statute enacted after Petitioner’s conviction but before his release to parole can affect, to the Petitioner’s disadvantage, the portion of the sentence remaining for Petitioner to serve following revocation of the parole. On November 5, 1964 Petitioner was sentenced to serve one to four years at the Maine State Prison. Under law existing at that time, a parolee’s sentence continued to run during the time he was absent from the prison on parole and the statutes and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Greenfield v. ScafatiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1967
- Mottram v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- In re StanleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- In Re EtieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Wall v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- John L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- State of West Virginia v. MethenyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2021
- State v. ColbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000