Legal Opinion

Colombel v. Milan

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 23, 1998No. 78,528PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brazil, C.J.:

In this appeal, we are considering the liability of a landlord for injuries to a plaintiff bitten by a dog owned by the tenants.

Loretta Colombel sued the tenants, Kay and Allen Milan, and the landlords, Michael and Kiersten Dodson.

The trial court dismissed the case against the Dodsons. Colombel appeals. We affirm.

Colombel suffered severe and permanent injury and disability as a result of an attack by the Milans’ dog at their residence. Colombel brought suit against the Dodsons as landlords, alleging that they had knowledge of the dangerous and vicious propensities of the Milans’…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ripley v. TolbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. Borders v. RoseberrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Noel v. Pizza Hut, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  4. Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Metropolitan Topeka Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCormick v. Board of Shawnee County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. Stokes v. LyddyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Meyer Land & Cattle Co. v. Lincoln County Conservation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  4. Stark v. Mercantile Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
  5. Seaboard Corp. v. Marsh Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API