Legal Opinion

Braxton v. . Matthews

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 24, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action to recover damages to the plaintiff’s person and property resulting from a collision of automobiles alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The verdict was favorable to the plaintiff, and from the judgment rendered the defendant appealed on exceptions appearing in the record.

There was evidence tending to show that the defendant owned the car, and that he and his driver operated it recklessly and wilfully while they were under the influence of intoxicating liquor.

All matters involved in the exceptions have heretofore been resolved against the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. State v. . TrottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Ballew v. Asheville & East Tennessee RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Oakley v. . LasaterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Foot v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Little v. . MilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API