Legal Opinion
Daylight Glass Mfg. Co. v. American Prismatic Light Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
Decided May 12, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
CROSS, District Judge.
There are four patents in suit in this case, as follows: Nos. 695,282, dated March 11, 1902, for “a machine for making prismatic glass windows”; No. 695,283, dated March 11, 1902, for “an improvement in methods of making sheets or panes of prismatic glass for use in making prismatic windows”; No. 695,284 dated March 11, 1902, for “improvements in methods of making prismatic windows”; and No. 710,434, dated October 7, 1902, for “improvement in prismatic glass windows.” All of the above patents were issued to one George K. Cummings, and by him assigned by various mesne…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Kirchberger v. American Acetylene Burner Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1903
- Albright v. LangfeldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
- Celluloid Manuf'g Co. v. Chrolithion Collar & Cuff Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
- Goss Printing-Press Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1901
3Cited by2 opinions
- Daylight Glass Mfg. Co. v. American Prismatic Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
- Macbeth-Evans Glass Co. v. L. E. Smith Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922