Macbeth-Evans Glass Co. v. L. E. Smith Glass Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentWoolley, Circuit Judge
I have trouble in finding invention in the lens of the patent. The thing the patentee did, when stated in simple terms, was this: In a plain lens of an automobile lamp he cut transverse horizontal refracting ridges, thus employing a well known expedient of the optical art for deflecting rays of light. For this (in conjunction with mechanism not here involved) he was granted Letters Patent No. 1,119,848, issued December 8, 1914. In this lens,some time later, he cut sections of vertical cylinders, again employing a well known expedient of the art for spreading rays laterally. Letters Patent No.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Daylight Glass Mfg. Co. v. American Prismatic Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
- Pressed Prism Glass Co. v. Continuous Glass Prism Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1910
- Daylight Glass Mfg. Co. v. American Prismatic Light Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1905
- Pressed Prism Plate Glass Co. v. Continuous Glass Press Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1907