Sexton v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARRISON, Judge.
Larry K. Sexton (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 1 motion following an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant alleges that he was entitled to relief because his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to timely follow through on a plea offer from the prosecutor’s office that would have resulted in Movant being sentenced to a shorter period of incarceration. We affirm.
Movant entered an Alford 2 plea of guilty to one count of first-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.050, on March 15, 1999. In exchange for his Alford plea, the State agreed to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Wilkins v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chaney v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Moore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Patrick v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. SextonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.