Legal Opinion

Sexton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 2001No. 23615PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRISON, Judge.

Larry K. Sexton (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 1 motion following an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant alleges that he was entitled to relief because his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to timely follow through on a plea offer from the prosecutor’s office that would have resulted in Movant being sentenced to a shorter period of incarceration. We affirm.

Movant entered an Alford 2 plea of guilty to one count of first-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.050, on March 15, 1999. In exchange for his Alford plea, the State agreed to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Leisure v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  4. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. Wilkins v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chaney v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Moore v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Patrick v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. State v. SextonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API