State v. Sexton

KENNETH W. SHRUM, Presiding Judge.

This case arises from Larry Sexton’s (“Defendant’s”) effort, via Rule 29.07(d), to withdraw the guilty plea he entered in 1999 to a first-degree assault charge, § 565.050, RSMo (1994). 1 Defendant filed his Rule 29.07(d) motion in May 2001 after he was unsuccessful in getting post-conviction relief through a Rule 24.035 filing. The trial court denied Defendant’s Rule 29.07(d) motion, and this appeal followed. In five points relied on, Defendant claims the court “clearly erred” in denying his requested relief. We disagree. We affirm the judgment.

FACTS

On…