Legal Opinion

Realty Dock & Improvement Corp. v. Anderson

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1917No. S. F. No. 6833PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

In June, 1908, the Union State Bank, a banking corporation, leased and went into the occupancy of a portion of the Monadnock building in San Francisco, under a ten-year lease from Herbert C. Law, its owner. In October, 1908, Law sold the property and assigned his interest in the lease given to him by the Union State Bank to the plaintiff. In July, 1909, the defendant, Alden Anderson, as superintendent of banks of this state, declared the Union State Bank to be insolvent, took charge of its property, business, and. banking premises, and with the assistance of his codefendant—S. P. Young, his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merritt & Bourne v. Judd & ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Levin v. Improved Property Holding Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  3. Harris v. KelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. In re Bahl's Ice Cream & Baking Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Wright v. La MayMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Nine Hundred Main, Inc. v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Bridges v. Cal-Pacific Leasing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. McKenzie v. Western Greenbrier BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API