Legal Opinion
State v. Cosgro
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 3, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Majority: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, LEVY, and GORMAN, JJ.
Dissent: ALEXANDER, and SILVER, JJ.
GORMAN, J.
[¶ 1] Robert S. Cosgro appeals from a judgment of conviction for failure to comply with registration and verification requirements of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act of 1999 (SORNA) (Class D), 34-A M.R.S. § 11227(1) (2007), entered on his conditional guilty plea in the District Court (Millinocket, Stitham, J.). Cosgro argues that the court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the criminal complaint on the grounds that SORNA constitutes ex post facto punishment. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Teel v. ColsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- State v. HaskellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Doe v. District AttorneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LetalienSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- John Doe I v. Robert WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- John Doe XLVI v. Stephanie AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- State v. LetalienSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- John Doe I v. Robert WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013