Doe v. District Attorney
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtCalkins, J.
[¶ 1] John Doe appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrup, J.) granting Evert Fowle, Craig Poulin, and Everett Flan-nery’s motions to dismiss, and dismissing Doe’s complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Doe argues that the court erred in dismissing his claims that the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act of 1999 (SOR-NA), 34-A M.R.S. §§ 11201-11256 (2006), violates his rights to procedural and substantive due process, equal protection, and a civil jury trial pursuant to the United States and Maine…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. LetalienSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- John Doe I v. Robert WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- Costain v. Sunbury Primary Care, P.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.