Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Decker

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 3, 2003No. SC 16692PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, C. J.

The defendant, Mark J. Decker, a physician, appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the trial court’s judgment in his favor and granting the plaintiff, Gilbert Hayes, a new trial. The sole question in this certified appeal is “[d]id the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiffs expert’s proffered testimony regarding the effect of discontinuation of blood pressure medication should have been admitted into evidence?” Hayes v. Decker, 259 Conn. 928, 793 A.2d 253 (2002). We conclude that the Appellate Court’s conclusion was correct and,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. State v. VegaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. State v. ScottTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. SorabellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Smith v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API