Ladd v. Estate of Kellenberger
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
Plaintiffs were not provided for in the will of May Gordon Latham Kellenberger, deceased. They bring this action claiming the Court should either enforce what they allege to be a contract made by Mrs. Kellenberger to adopt them or declare them to have been equitably adopted. Then, as adopted children, they should be entitled to share in Mrs. Kellenberger’s estate.
The principal question is whether the complaint states a claim for relief sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). The trial court concluded it does not and the Court of Appeals affirmed, holding…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Smith v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Kofka v. RosickyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Bedal v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Embree Construction Group, Inc. v. Rafcor, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Wray v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- Forsyth Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.