Legal Opinion

Matter of Tootle

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 28, 1995No. 24310PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an attorney disciplinary matter. Respondent admits to misconduct in the following matters.

1) Karesztes Matter

Catherine Karesztes, a Massachusetts resident, retained respondent to close on the refinancing of a loan for property located in Beaufort. The closing took place on September 4, 1992, and Karesztes was due $1,746.45. The mortgages were recorded on September 10, and November 6, 1992. After several months and following numerous phone calls, Mrs. Karesztes still had not received the amount she was due from the closing. Respondent told Mrs. Karesztes he was waiting on some papers…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of HollerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. In Re DaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. In Re MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. In Re MatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API