Matter of Tootle
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
This is an attorney disciplinary matter. Respondent admits to misconduct in the following matters.
1) Karesztes Matter
Catherine Karesztes, a Massachusetts resident, retained respondent to close on the refinancing of a loan for property located in Beaufort. The closing took place on September 4, 1992, and Karesztes was due $1,746.45. The mortgages were recorded on September 10, and November 6, 1992. After several months and following numerous phone calls, Mrs. Karesztes still had not received the amount she was due from the closing. Respondent told Mrs. Karesztes he was waiting on some papers…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of HollerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- In Re DaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- In Re MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- In Re MatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998