Legal Opinion
Harwell v. Wood
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 10, 1923No. 11386PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREADGILL, 0.
This is a case in which S. G. Wood, defendant in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought an action against T. A. Harwell and F. E. Martin, plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, to recover damages in the sum of $1,080 under section 6006, Comp. Stats. 1921, which section reads as follows:
“For forcibly ejecting or excluding a person from the possession of real property, the measure of damages is three times such a sum as would compensate for the detriment caused to him by the act complained of.”
The plaintiff alleged and contended that the defendants and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. South Missouri Pine Lumber Co. v. DearingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- Hamilton v. BlakeneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Smith v. RockettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Reger v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Buckeye Engine Co. v. City of CherokeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. LaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Pace v. OttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Sohio Petroleum Co. v. BrannanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- J. F. Smith, Inc. v. PattonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941