Legal Opinion
United States v. Eason Oil Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 22, 1934No. 1638PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YAUGHT, District Judge.
The United States of America brings this action alleging that the defendant is the owner of certain leases in the Crescent oil field of Logan county,. Okl.; that, under the National Industrial Recovery Act, the President of the United States is authorized to prepare or have prepared a code of fair competition to effectuate the purposes of said act, and that, by virtue of and pursuant to section 3 (a), title 1 of the said Act (15 USCA § 703 (a), the President, by Executive Order No. 6256 dated August 19, 1933, approved a code of fair competition for the petroleum…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Butler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- Douglas v. WallaceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1934
- United States v. Kinnebrew Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1934
- Immigration Consequences of Undocumented Aliens' Arrival in United States Territorial Waters, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1993
- United States v. MorganDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.