Legal Opinion

Etheridge v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 14, 1915No. 3525PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was convicted of perjury, his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record does not contain a statement of facts, but as the case is presented the evidence is not necessary to a decision.

The indictment charges perjury as having been committed in the County Court on a trial based alone on a complaint charging appellant with a violation of the gaming laws. In substance he testified in the gaming case that he did not play at a game of craps and was not present. A detail of the indictment is not necessary. It charges that he was tried on a complaint,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ethridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Leal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  3. Whitesides v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  4. Dickinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  5. Sponberg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. District Court of Tulsa Co.Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Bennett v. District Court of Tulsa Co.Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Wesley Perkins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API