Legal Opinion

Whitesides v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 28, 1903No. 2542PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Ho statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSOH, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of unlawfully killing a cow, and fined $25.

When this cause was called for trial, the court quashed the information, and immediately permitted the prosecution to file new pleadings, over appellant’s objection. This action of the court was correct. The court then called on appellant to answer to the new information. Appellant asked for two days time in which to prepare his cause and file written pleadings, which was refused by the court, and exception taken. This exception was well taken. The filing of the new information made a new case, and…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bohannan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API