Kasal v. Picha
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Appeal by defendant from an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, after verdict for plaintiff in an action for damages for the alleged malicious prosecution of a civil action. The suit complained of was to recover damages from defendant therein (¡plaintiff and respondent here), because, as the appellant charged, she had been guilty of maliciously sowing thistles in his field. That action was dismissed at the close of plaintiff’s evidence. Thereupon, this action was commenced, resulting as already indicated.
There are certain assignments of error…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pleasants v. FantSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- State ex rel. Niessen v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Olsson v. Midland InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Jensen v. FischerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Brown v. KeyesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Survis v. A. Y. McDonald Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Youmans v. BerknerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926