Legal Opinion

Youmans v. Berkner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1926No. 25,228PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Action for malicious prosecution. The summons was not served on defendant Peabody who had removed to California. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant Bosshard and against defendant Berkner. The court rendered judgment for defendant Berk-ner notwithstanding the verdict and plaintiff appealed therefrom.

Plaintiff had been indicted by the grand jury of Hennepin county on the charge that he had obtained property from defendant Boss-hard- by false and fraudulent representations and pretenses. He was tried and acquitted. Thereafter he brought this action alleging that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cox v. LauritsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Moore v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Jones v. FlahertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Kasal v. PichaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Dombrovske v. DombrovskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Higgins v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Drakos v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. Miller v. American National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API