Youmans v. Berkner
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Action for malicious prosecution. The summons was not served on defendant Peabody who had removed to California. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant Bosshard and against defendant Berkner. The court rendered judgment for defendant Berk-ner notwithstanding the verdict and plaintiff appealed therefrom.
Plaintiff had been indicted by the grand jury of Hennepin county on the charge that he had obtained property from defendant Boss-hard- by false and fraudulent representations and pretenses. He was tried and acquitted. Thereafter he brought this action alleging that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cox v. LauritsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Moore v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Jones v. FlahertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Kasal v. PichaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Dombrovske v. DombrovskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Higgins v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Drakos v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Miller v. American National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943