Legal Opinion

Hazuka v. Estate of Jelinek

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1945No. 31923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

Plaintiff filed a claim for money loaned against the estate of Sophie Jelinek. Hearing was had in the county court and the claim disallowed. Plaintiff appealed to the district court. Defendants, in the district court, moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the transcript was insufficient to confer jurisdiction. The trial court overruled the motion. Issues were made in the district court and trial had. At the close of plaintiff’s case in chief, on motion of the defendants, the trial court dismissed the action. Plaintiff appeals and defendants cross-appeal. We sustain the judgment, of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baker v. KirwinNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Sorensen v. SorensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Tecumseh National Bank v. McGeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Edwards v. YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Oft v. OhrtNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wimer v. HinkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Fincham Ex Rel. Fincham v. MuellerNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Ehlers v. LindekugelNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Dowding v. DowdingNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Sisson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API