Legal Opinion

Baker v. Kirwin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1944No. 31663PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

Appeal is taken from a;n allowance of the claim of Roy R. Baker against the estate' of James O. Bhker, deceased, for the reasonable value of services rendered the deceased during 'the latter years of his lifetime. Hereinafter appellant will be designated as defendant, and appellee as plaintiff. The claim was allowed in the county court and upon appeal to the district court a jury affirmed the award by returning a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $10,950. The assignments of error are that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence and is contrary to the instructions of the trial *799court;…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estate of KesslerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Laughnan v. Estate of LaughnanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Edwards v. YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Fitch v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Owens v. ReedNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Shurrum v. WattsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Startin v. MadsenUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Pike v. TriskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Murray v. GrissimCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
  5. Abilheira v. FariaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API