Legal Opinion
MALYUTIN v. Rice
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 29, 2009No. Civil Action 09-93 (EGS)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a motion to dismiss the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, alternatively, under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Because proceeding on this complaint would require judicial review of a consular decision to deny a visa application — a decision that is exempt from judicial review — the complaint will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Aleksandr Malyutin, is a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kleindienst v. MandelSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Baan Rao Thai Restaurant v. Michael PompeoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- Matushkina v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Norris v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Dominion of Cab Drivers v. D.C. Professional Taxicab Drivers AssociationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Harbison v. U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign RelationsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.