Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Haak

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 6, 2021No. 1:19-cv-10137Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION JERMAINE FRANKLIN, JR., and JERMAINE FRANKLIN JR., INC., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:19-cv-10137 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington MARK F. HAAK, Defendant. __________________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER INDICATING THAT PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM THE JUDGMENT WOULD BE GRANTED IF THE CASE WERE REMANDED BY THE COURT OF APPEALS This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Relief from the Judgment. ECF No. 77. Plaintiffs, the boxer Jermaine Franklin, Jr. and his corporation, ask this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Cincinnati Bronze, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Thompson v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Arthur Tyler v. Carl AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API