Legal Opinion
Certified Nutraceuticals Inc. v. The Clorox Company
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 18, 2022No. 3:18-cv-00744Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 CERTIFIED NUTRACEUTICALS, Case No.: 3:18-cv-744-W-KSC INC., a California corporation, 14 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff, 15 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOC. 16 168] THE CLOROX COMPANY, et al., 17 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 Pending before the Court is Defendants The Clorox Company, Nutranext, and 22 Neocell Holding Company’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motion for summary judgment. 23 (Mot. [Doc. 168].) Plaintiff Certified Nutraceuticals, Inc. opposes and requests that its 24 Opposition be filed…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.