Legal Opinion

City of Texarkana v. Wiggins

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1952No. A-3273PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

Respondents, all nonresidents of the City of Texarkana, Texas, filed this suit against Petitioner, the City, seeking to enjoin it in the operation of its municipally-owned water and sewer systems from charging nonresidents higher water and sewer rates than those paid by persons residing within the corporate limits of the city.

The trial court rendered judgment for Petitioner, the judgment reciting that the court heard sufficient evidence to determine the case on its merits. This judgment was reversed and the cause remanded by the Court of Civil Appeals. 239 S.W. 2d 212. The case is before us…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Terral v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. City of Paris v. SturgeonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  5. City of Montgomery v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. City of Big Spring v. Board of ControlTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Public Utility Commission of Texas v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. San Antonio Independent School District v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Hatten v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API