Moore v. Smith-Snagg
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
793 So.2d 1000 (2001)
Clarence MOORE and Savannah Moore, Appellants,
v.
Mary Jean SMITH-SNAGG and Paul Snagg, et al., Appellees.
No. 5D01-334.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 18, 2001.
Opinion on Denial of Rehearing August 24, 2001.
Ronald R. Howell, Longwood, for Appellants.
Martin S. Awerbach and Michael A. Cohn, of Awerbach, Murphy & Cohn, P.A., Clearwater, for Appellee, Universal City Development Partners.
Dana P. Hoffman of Griffin, Linder, Carter & Hoffman, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees, Mary Jean Smith-Snagg, Paul Snagg and Clarence Milton.
2Per curiam
This appeal challenges the…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Palmer; Concurrence · Palmer.
3Cases cited11 opinions
- McCoy v. LoveSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Zurstrassen v. StonierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Wright v. BlockerSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Holland v. HattawayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Cox v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by7 opinions
- Burk v. DemarayNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Tyler v. PriceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Padron Warehouse Corp. v. Realty Associates Fund III, L.P.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
- Knowles v. EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Joseph Grimes v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.