Legal Opinion

Brygidyr v. Rieman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 2, 1954PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

31 N.J. Super. 450 (1954)

107 A.2d 59

STEVEN BRYGIDYR, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v.

WILLIAM RIEMAN T/A FEDERAL WINDOW CLEANING COMPANY, RESPONDENT, AND M.G.V. SCHAEBISCHER T/A SCHWABEN HALLE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 15, 1954.

Decided July 2, 1954.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, FRANCIS and FREUND.

Mr. Elias A. Kanter argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant (Mr. Louis C. Jacobson, attorney).

Mr. Henry F. Hoey, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent-respondent (Mr. William P. Braun, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bertucci v. Metropolitan Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. Gerber v. ShermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  3. Mittan v. O'RourkeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  4. Jordan v. Lindeman & Co.New York County Court, Essex County · 1945
  5. Priby v. LeePennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cassano v. AschoffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  2. Bright v. Reynolds Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
  3. Pollack v. Pino's Formal WearNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  4. Thorsheim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. National Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API