Legal Opinion

Mittan v. O'Rourke

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 21, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brogan, Chief Justice.

This certiorari brings up for review a judgment awarding compensation to the petitioner.

The petitioner was in the employ of Jack O’Rourke, doing mason work, as a result of which he sustained eye injuries which arose out of and in the course of his employment. He filed a petition against O’Rourke praying for compensation under the statute. The petition was not contested and an award was made which the petitioner was unable to have satisfied, either in whole or in part, the said O’Rourke not having any workmen’s compensation…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pollack v. Pino's Formal WearNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  2. Brygidyr v. RiemanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Jordan v. Lindeman & Co.New York County Court, Essex County · 1945
  4. Lesniewski v. W.B. Furze Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  5. McComish v. DeSoiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API