Legal Opinion

Bertucci v. Metropolitan Construction Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 3, 1952PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

21 N.J. Super. 318 (1952)

91 A.2d 153

VINCENT BERTUCCI, AN INFANT, BY COSMO BERTUCCI, HIS NATURAL GUARIAN AND PARENT, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

METROPOLITAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND GERALD TORLUCCI AND JOSEPH TORLUCCI, AND NATIONAL CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued July 21, 1952.

Decided September 3, 1952.

Before Judges SCHETTINO, LLOYD and WOODS.

Mr. John A. Laird argued the cause for respondent-appellant (Mr. Louis Asarnow, attorney).

Mr. Harry Cohn argued the cause for petitioner-respondent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Corbett v. Starrett Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  2. Gerber v. ShermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cassano v. AschoffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  2. Pollack v. Pino's Formal WearNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  3. Colón Santiago v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969
  4. Brygidyr v. RiemanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. Williams v. A & L Packing & StorageNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API