Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 30, 2008No. A07-2413PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district "court’s decision sustaining the revocation of his license to drive under the implied-consent law, arguing that the police officer’s failure to check the appropriate box on the “Implied Consent Law Peace Officer’s Certificate” violated the requirement of Minn. Stat. § 169A.52, subd. 4(a) (2006), that test results be certified. Appellant also argues that such an omission violated his right to due process. Because the due process argument is not meritorious and because the police officer certified the test results by forwarding to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Davis v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Davis v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Godderz v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Williams v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  3. David Anthony Janssen v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  4. State of Minnesota v. Chad Thomas KarnowskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API