Legal Opinion

Laney v. Rush

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 19, 1941No. 5254PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLEY, Justice.

The appellant, John B. Laney, sued the appellees, O. E. Bush and Melvin Alvey, alleged to be policemen of the City of Lubbock, Texas, and W. H. Rogers, city manager, and the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, surety on the official bond of the city manager, to recover $50 actual damages and $3,000 exemplary damages in connection with a shooting affray in Lubbock when the policemen, Rush and Alvey, attempted to arrest Laney. A general demurrer filed by the appellees addressed to the appellant’s petition was sustained by the trial court, and upon appellant’s declining to amend…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hill v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Waube v. WarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Stillman v. HirschTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HayterTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TrottTexas Supreme Court · 1894

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Houston Electric Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Houston Lighting & Power Company v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Wedgworth v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. CREDIT PLAN CORPORATION OF HOUSTON v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Trotter v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API