Legal Opinion
Redemptorist Fathers v. Purdy
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1933No. 24570. Department TwoPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
This is an action on a promissory note and mortgage, executed October 15,1928, by defendants Purdy to plaintiff. The property is located in the Denny Hill re-grade district and is described as lots 5 and 6, block T, Bell’s Sixth Addition to Seattle.
The defendants Nelson were joined as parties asserting some claim to the property. They filed an answer setting up the nature of their claim, which is based upon the following instrument:
“Encumbered Property
“Contract No. 7.
“Agreement Made this 7th day of November, 1928, between George Nelson- & Co., party of the first part, hereinafter called the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hossack v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Speirs v. JahnsenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. LawrenceWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- In re the Estate of SpringerWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Curtis v. JanzenWashington Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- B. Kuppenheimer & Co. v. MorninCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Thomas v. OsbornCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Flyge v. FlynnNevada Supreme Court · 1946
- Huber v. Coast Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.