Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Janzen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1893No. 800PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whatcom County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, C. J.

John Janzen made and delivered his promissory note to Charles M. Curtis, the respondent, for the sum of $324.75, and deposited with the agent of Curtis, as security for the payment of said note, a certain contract theretofore entered into between the said John Janzen and the Fairhaven Land Company, for the purchase by him, the said John Janzen, from the said company, of certain lots of land situated in the city of Fairhaven, Washington. Janzen was made and designated as vendee in said contract, and at the time the contract was deposited as…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Redemptorist Fathers v. PurdyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Glaze v. Pullman State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Swartz v. Will Starkey Theaters Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. West Beach Marina, Ltd., a Texas Limited Partnership, N/K/A West Beach Limited Partnership v. James M. Erdeljac Darci Erdeljac Dr. James R. Yates Dr. Alba A. Ortiz Thomas Rosenthal And Susan Hemmingway Rosenthal, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API