Legal Opinion
Davis v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 20, 2006No. 24041-0-IIIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
132 P.3d 783 (2006)
132 Wash.App. 515
James DAVIS and Gail Davis, husband and wife, Appellants,
v.
Michael TAYLOR and Rhonda Taylor, husband and wife, Respondents.
No. 24041-0-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
April 20, 2006.
Robert E. Jr. Lawrence-Berrey, Attorney at Law, Yakima, WA, for Appellant.
James Stephen Elliott, Velikanje Moore & Shore PS, Yakima, WA, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, C.J.
¶ 1 State and county right-to-farm laws insulate farmers from liability for nuisances that preexist residential development. Here, after a neighboring residential development had been well established,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buchanan v. Simplot Feeders LPWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Buchanan v. Simplot Feeders Ltd. PartnershipWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Entertainment Industry Coalition v. Tacoma-Pierce County Health DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Tucker v. HayfordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Alpental Community Club, Inc. v. Seattle Gymnastics SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Village of LaFayette v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- The Village of LaFayette v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015