Beuchert v. State

Hadley,. J.

1. Appellant was convicted upon an indictment charging, him'with receiving goods known to have been stolen. He moved to quash the indictment on the _ ground that it failed to charge the name of the thief, or that his name was to the grand jury unknown. The court overruled the motion, and this action is assigned as error. The question is decided adversely to appellant’s contention in Semon v. State (1902), 158 Ind. 55.

2. The overruling of his motion for a new trial is also complained of. Under this assignment appellant first challenges the action of the court in refusing to give to…