Legal Opinion

Higgins v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1901No. 19,535PublishedCited by 33 opinions

From Marion Criminal Court; Fremont Alford, Judge. From a conviction for soliciting a bribe, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, C. J.

Appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted, under §2097 Bums 1894, §2010 R. S. 1881 and Horner 1897, for soliciting a bribe. The assignment of errors calls in question the action of the court in overruling the motion to quash the second count of the indictment, and in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Appellant was a member of the common council of the city of Indianapolis. In May, 1900, while an ordinance, granting the Parry Manufacturing Company the right to lay, maintain, and operate a switch across certain streets and alleys in said city, was pending before the common council of…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. People v. . O'SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. State v. BradySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Commonwealth v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  5. Mayer v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. ANTROBUS v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Eacock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. State v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  4. State v. DuLaneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  5. Dotterer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API