Geldon v. Finnegan
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
The principal contention made here is that the fire marshal and his deputies are quasi-judicial officers and are not liable for acts performed by them in the course of the discharge of their official duties, which involve a certain amount of discretion, so long as they act within their jurisdiction. A determination of the question raised requires a consideration of the statutes, secs. 200.19 to 200.21, the material parts of which are printed in the margin.1
*544It is the contention of the defendants that the deputy fire marshal, Finnegan, under the last clause of sec. 200.21 (1), was empowered to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Craker v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Bergeron v. PeytonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Rainer v. SchulteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- State ex rel. Traister v. MahoneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Phillips v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. ZitoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Peloquin v. HibnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- SuperX Drugs of Kentucky, Inc. v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
- Vajner v. Orange VillageCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1963