Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Traister v. Mahoney

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1928PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

The facts above recited are substantially all facts concerning which there is either no dispute in the record before us or of matters concerning which we deem any possible denial or qualification as entirely immaterial.

The proper administration of justice and of judicial procedure neither required nor demanded any proceedings such as were here had before the county court. Mathiesen v. State, 195 Wis. 364, 218 N. W. 184. It is undisputed that the district attorney knew that counsel had been retained for Traister. It is undisputed that Traister, a cripple, was in custody in the county jail from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Emerson v. BoylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  3. In Re SnyderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. United States v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hayes v. StatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Peloquin v. HibnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. County CourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Siegel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Geldon v. FinneganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API