Legal Opinion
Seattle Nat. Bank v. Pratt
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
Decided July 10, 1900PublishedCited by 8 opinions
At Law.
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, District Judge.
This is an action to recover of the defendant, who was a stockholder of the Western Farm Mortgage Trust Company, a Kansas corporation, the additional liability created by the constitution and laws of that state. The only defense, necessary to consider, is the statute of limitations. The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the trust company January 18, 1897, upon a debt which matured prior to March, 1898. Execution was returned nulla bona on the same day. An alias execution was issued and returned nulla bona April 15, 1897. A receiver was appointed for the trust company…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cottrell v. ManloveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
- First National Bank v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- Hobbs v. National Bank of Commerce of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
- Hobbs v. National Bank of Commerce of Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
- Crocker v. BallCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1900
3Cited by8 opinions
- Russell v. ToddSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Todd v. RussellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
- Ramsden v. GatelyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906
- Whitman v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
- Hillmer v. AndersonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.