Legal Opinion
Hillmer v. Anderson
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided June 24, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
Plaintiff Armin F. Hillmer is a creditor of the Chicago Bank of Commerce, a banking corporation of the state of Illinois. On the 25th day of June, 1932, it was determined that the capital of said bank had become impaired and the bank was prohibited from the further carrying on of its business. A receiver was appointed on the 28th day of June to con*458vert the assets of the bank into money and distribute it among the creditors of the bank. Another receiver was appointed at the same time to collect, receive, and disburse amounts due from stockholders of said bank on account…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Booth v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Hale v. AllinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Platt v. WilmotSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Sanders v. Merchants State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Sterrett Ex Rel. Alabama Trust & Savings Co. v. Second National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Geisler v. BenkenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946
- Bankson v. AndersonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1937
- Bicknell v. HoodNew York Supreme Court · 1938
- Continental Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. BestDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
- Lyon v. TookerNew York Supreme Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.