Legal Opinion

Silverman v. Re

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 27, 1961No. Civ. A. 2084PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

This is an action under § 16(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78p(b), to recover short swing profits. 1 Plaintiff is the beneficial owner of ten shares of the Class “A” common stock of the corporate defendant Rokeach. The corporation, to which the recovery runs, was named as a nominal party defendant. Whether this procedural step is required, because the corporation may be considered an indispensable party is unclear. See Loss, Securities Regulation 568 (Supp.1955). 2 The corporation now moves to be named as a party…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  2. Gratz v. ClaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  3. Park & Tilford, Inc. v. SchulteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  4. Pellegrino v. NesbitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  5. Nicholas Ferraiolo v. F. R. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. XO Communications, Inc. (In Re XO Communications, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  2. Molybdenum Corp. of America v. International Mining Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  3. Berman v. ThomsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
  4. Lazar v. Merchants' National Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API