Silverman v. Re
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
This is an action under § 16(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b), 15 U.S.C.A. § 78p(b), to recover short swing profits. 1 Plaintiff is the beneficial owner of ten shares of the Class “A” common stock of the corporate defendant Rokeach. The corporation, to which the recovery runs, was named as a nominal party defendant. Whether this procedural step is required, because the corporation may be considered an indispensable party is unclear. See Loss, Securities Regulation 568 (Supp.1955). 2 The corporation now moves to be named as a party…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Gratz v. ClaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Park & Tilford, Inc. v. SchulteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Pellegrino v. NesbitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Nicholas Ferraiolo v. F. R. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rosenberg v. XO Communications, Inc. (In Re XO Communications, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Molybdenum Corp. of America v. International Mining Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Berman v. ThomsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
- Lazar v. Merchants' National Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964